sfSpanI am a huge fan of The New York Times and its Sunday Magazine’s annual “Year in Ideas” issue. I look forward to it every year and spend hours reading every word and following up on the ideas contained in it. I find it essential reading as a person who generally wants to be informed of intellectual currents.  But it also usually contains discussion of key trends in communications and public policy.  While this year’s issue was certainly worth reading and I recommend that you do, it was somewhat disappointing to me.  I don’t know if there was a different editor this year or what, but the ideas just don’t seem very cutting edge and there are too many items that are about meaningless crap.  I mean, was Alexander McQueen’s Stiletto Claw shoe — which is even by Vogue’s standards completely unwearable — a significant NEW IDEA worthy of the Year in Ideas?  I don’t think so.

Despite this, there were some important ideas that Public Policy Communicators should be aware of:

Advertisement that Watches You

Forensic Polling Analysis

Good Enough is the New Great — this, in my opinion, is the MOST important idea in the issue for PPC members

Social Networks as Foreign Policy

Subscription Artists

Web Searches in Real Time

And any manager would also be interested in reading about these topics:

Myth of the Deficient Older Employee

Random Promotions

All in all, the NYTimes Year in Ideas continues to be essential reading, but I would prefer if they stuck with substance and not with useless “ideas” like empty beer bottles make better weapons and non-trends like “heritage chic.”  There should be more than eight applicable ideas for public policy communicators in the whole thing!